首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative study of unscreened and screened molecular static linear polarizability in the Hartree-Fock, hybrid-density functional, and density functional models
【2h】

Comparative study of unscreened and screened molecular static linear polarizability in the Hartree-Fock, hybrid-density functional, and density functional models

机译:未筛选和筛选分子静态线性模型的比较研究   Hartree-Fock的极化率,杂化密度泛函和密度   功能模型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The sum-over-states (SOS) polarizabilities are calculated within theapproximate independent electron theories such as the Hartree-Fockapproximation and density functional models using the eigenvalues and orbitalsobtained from the self-consistent solution of single-particle equations. TheSOS polarizabilities are then compared with those calculated using thefinite-field method within three widely used single particle models: (1) theHartree-Fock (HF) method, (2) the three parameter hybrid generalized gradientapproximation (B3LYP), and (3) the parameter free generalized gradientapproximation due to Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE). The comparison is carriedout for polarizabilities of 142 molecules calculated using the 6-311++G(d,p)orbital basis at the geometries optimized at the B3LYP/6-311G** level. Theresults show that the SOS method almost always overestimate the FFpolarizabilities in the PBE and B3LYP models. This trend is reversed in the HFmethod however exception to the trend do exist. The mean absolute errors (MAE)in the screened (FF) and unscreened (SOS) polarizability are 0.78 \AA$^3$ forthe HF method, 1.87 \AA$^3$ for the B3LYP, and 3.44 \AA$^3$ for the PBE-GGA.The Hartree-Fock approximation predicts finite-field polarizabilities that aresmaller than those predicted by the PBE and B3LYP models. Finally, a simplescheme is devised to obtain FF quality estimate of polarizability from thoseobtained using the SOS method by exploiting the observed trends.
机译:使用从单粒子方程的自洽解获得的特征值和轨道,在近似独立的电子理论(例如Hartree-Fock近似和密度泛函模型)中计算总和态(SOS)极化率。然后将SOS极化率与在三种广泛使用的单粒子模型中使用有限域方法计算出的极化率进行比较:(1)Hartree-Fock(HF)方法;(2)三参数混合广义梯度逼近(B3LYP);以及(3)由于Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof(PBE)而产生的无参数的广义梯度逼近。使用B-LYP / 6-311G **水平优化的几何结构,对使用6-311 ++ G(d,p)轨道计算的142个分子的极化率进行了比较。结果表明,SOS方法几乎总是高估了PBE和B3LYP模型中的FF极化率。在HF方法中,这种趋势是相反的,但是确实存在例外。屏蔽法(FF)和非屏蔽法(SOS)极化率的平均绝对误差(MAE)对于HF方法为0.78 \ AA $ ^ 3 $,对于B3LYP为1.87 \ AA $ ^ 3 $和3.44 \ AA $ ^ 3 $ Hartree-Fock近似预测的有限域极化率比PBE和B3LYP模型预测的要小。最后,设计了一种简单的方案,通过利用观测到的趋势,从使用SOS方法获得的偏振结果中获得FF质量的极化率估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号